Startseite Partner Suche Impressum Kontakt Diskussionsforum

-

-

Aktuelle Jobs

-

 

Jobbörse

 

-

Allgemein

-

 

Diskussionsforum

 

 

IFRS/IAS  

 

Newsletter  

Musterabschluss

Abschlüsse

-

Dienstleistungen

-

 

IFRS Anwendergruppe

 

 

Umstellungen auf IFRS  

Software/IFRS-Toolkit

-

Grundlagen

-

 

Was sind IFRS/IAS?

 

 

Was ist der IASB?  

 

Umstellungsprozess  

 

Endorsement  

Glossar

-

Mittelstand

-

 

IFRS für KMU  

-

Literatur

-

 

Presse

 

 

Aufsatzdatenbank  

 

Fachbücher  

Broschüren

-

Texte deutsch

-

 

Framework

 

 

Standards  

Interpretations

-

Texte englisch

-

 

Framework

 

 

Standards  

Interpretations

-

Sonstiges

-

 

Gästebuch

 

 

Archive  

 

Links  

 

Über uns  

Sitemap


-

Standing Interpretations Committee Interpretation  SIC-2 (2003)

Previous | Index | Next

  Source

-

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1725/2003 of 29 September 2003 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

  Content

-

Consistency - capitalisation of borrowing costs

Paragraph 11 of IAS 1 (revised 1997), presentation of financial statements, requires that financial statements should not be described as complying with International Accounting Standards unless they comply with all the requirements of each applicable standard and each applicable interpretation issued by the Standing Interpretations Committee. SIC interpretations are not intended to apply to immaterial items.

Reference: IAS 23, borrowing costs.

Issue

1. IAS 23.07 and 23.11 allow the choice of either:

  • (a) recognising all borrowing costs as an expense in the period in which they are incurred (benchmark treatment); or

  • (b) capitalising borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets as part of the cost of that asset (allowed alternative treatment).

2. The issue is whether an enterprise that has chosen a policy of capitalising borrowing costs should apply this policy to all qualifying assets or whether an enterprise may choose to capitalise borrowing costs for certain qualifying assets and not for others.

Consensus

3. Where an enterprise adopts the allowed alternative treatment, that treatment should be applied consistently to all borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of all qualifying assets of the enterprise. If all the conditions laid down in IAS 23.11 are met, an enterprise should continue to capitalise such borrowing costs even if the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its recoverable amount. However, IAS 23.19 explains that the carrying amount of the asset should be written down to recognise impairment losses in such cases.

Date of consensus: July 1997.

Effective date: Periods beginning on or after 1 January 1998; earlier application is encouraged. Changes in accounting policies should be accounted for using the transition requirements of IAS 23.30. Therefore, an enterprise using the allowed alternative treatment may choose not to capitalise all borrowing costs incurred before the effective date of this interpretation.

 

Previous | Index | Next

 

 


 

Anzeige

Newsletter:

Name

E-Mail

-

Partner

-

RöverBrönner KG

-

Mediadaten

-

 

Zugriffszahlen

 

Onlinewerbung

-

Veranstalter

-

 

AvenDATA GmbH

 

 

Digitale Signatur

 

 

GDPdU Portal

 

 

Unternehmens-nachfolge

 

 

Verfahrens-dokumentation

 

 

AvenDATA GmbH. Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 14 . D-10553 Berlin . Deutschland
  Tel +49 30 700 157 500 . Fax +49 30 700 157 599  . E-mail: webmaster@ifrs-portal.com