|
Commission Regulation
(EC) No 2237/2004 of 29 December 2004 amending
Regulation (EC) No 1725/2003 adopting certain
international accounting standards in accordance with
Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament
and of the Council, as regards IAS No 32 and IFRIC 1
Content |
|
- |
Changes in
Existing Decommissioning, Restoration
and Similar Liabilities
References:
IAS 1
Presentation of Financial Statements (as revised in
2003)
IAS 8
Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and
Errors
IAS 16 Property,
Plant and Equipment (as revised in 2003)
IAS 23
Borrowing Costs
IAS 36 Impairment
of Assets (as revised in 2004)
IAS 37
Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
Background
1. Many entities
have obligations to dismantle, remove and restore items of
property, plant and equipment. In this Interpretation such
obligations are referred to as ‘decommissioning, restoration
and similar liabilities’. Under IAS 16, the cost of an item
of property, plant and equipment includes the initial
estimate of the costs of dismantling and removing the item
and restoring the site on which it is located, the
obligation for which an entity incurs either when the item
is acquired or as a consequence of having used the item
during a particular period for purposes other than to
produce inventories during that period. IAS 37 contains
requirements on how to measure decommissioning, restoration
and similar liabilities. This Interpretation provides
guidance on how to account for the effect of changes in the
measurement of existing decommissioning, restoration and
similar liabilities.
Scope
2. This
Interpretation applies to changes in the measurement of any
existing decommissioning, restoration or similar liability
that is both:
(a) recognised
as part of the cost of an item of property, plant and
equipment in accordance with IAS 16;
and
(b) recognised
as a liability in accordance with IAS 37.
For example, a
decommissioning, restoration or similar liability may exist
for decommissioning a plant, rehabilitating environmental
damage in extractive industries, or removing equipment.
Issue
3. This
Interpretation addresses how the effect of the following
events that change the measurement of an existing
decommissioning, restoration or similar liability should be
accounted for:
(a) a change
in the estimated outflow of resources embodying economic
benefits (eg cash flows) required to settle the
obligation;
(b) a change
in the current market-based discount rate as defined in
paragraph 47 of IAS 37 (this includes changes in the
time value of money and the risks specific to the
liability); and (c) an increase that reflects the
passage of time (also referred to as the unwinding of
the discount).
Consensus
4. Changes in the
measurement of an existing decommissioning, restoration and
similar liability that result from changes in the estimated
timing or amount of the outflow of resources embodying
economic benefits required to settle the obligation, or a
change in the discount rate, shall be accounted for in
accordance with paragraphs 5-7 below.
5. If the related
asset is measured using the cost model:
(a) subject to
(b), changes in the liability shall be added to, or
deducted from, the cost of the related asset in the
current period.
(b) the amount
deducted from the cost of the asset shall not exceed its
carrying amount. If a decrease in the liability exceeds
the carrying amount of the asset, the excess shall be
recognised immediately in profit or loss.
(c) if the
adjustment results in an addition to the cost of an
asset, the entity shall consider whether this is an
indication that the new carrying amount of the asset may
not be fully recoverable. If it is such an indication,
the entity shall test the asset for impairment by
estimating its recoverable amount, and shall account for
any impairment loss, in accordance with IAS 36.
6. If the related
asset is measured using the revaluation model:
(a) changes in
the liability alter the revaluation surplus or deficit
previously recognised on that asset, so that:
(i) a
decrease in the liability shall (subject to (b)) be
credited directly to revaluation surplus in equity,
except that it shall be recognised in profit or loss
to the extent that it reverses a revaluation deficit
on the asset that was previously recognised in
profit or loss;
(ii) an
increase in the liability shall be recognised in
profit or loss, except that it shall be debited
directly to revaluation surplus in equity to the
extent of any credit balance existing in the
revaluation surplus in respect of that asset.
(b) in the
event that a decrease in the liability exceeds the
carrying amount that would have been recognised had the
asset been carried under the cost model, the excess
shall be recognised immediately in profit or loss.
(c) a change
in the liability is an indication that the asset may
have to be revalued in order to ensure that the carrying
amount does not differ materially from that which would
be determined using fair value at the balance sheet
date. Any such revaluation shall be taken into account
in determining the amounts to be taken to profit or loss
and equity under (a). If a revaluation is necessary, all
assets of that class shall be revalued.
(d) IAS 1
requires disclosure on the face of the statement of
changes in equity of each item of income or expense that
is recognised directly in equity. In complying with this
requirement, the change in the revaluation surplus
arising
from a change in the liability shall be separately
identified and disclosed as such.
7. The adjusted
depreciable amount of the asset is depreciated over its
useful life. Therefore, once the related asset has reached
the end of its useful life, all subsequent changes in the
liability shall be recognised in profit or loss as they
occur. This applies under both the cost model and the
revaluation model.
8. The periodic
unwinding of the discount shall be recognised in profit or
loss as a finance cost as it occurs. The allowed alternative
treatment of capitalisation under IAS 23 is not permitted.
Effective Date
9. An entity shall
apply this Interpretation for annual periods beginning on or
after 1 September 2004. Earlier application is encouraged.
If an entity applies the Interpretation for a period
beginning before 1 September 2004, it shall disclose that
fact.
Transition
10. Changes in
accounting policies shall be accounted for according to the
requirements of IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in
Accounting Estimates and Errors. (*)
(*) If an entity
applies this Interpretation for a period beginning before 1
January 2005, the entity shall follow the requirements of
the previous version of IAS 8, which was entitled Net Profit
or Loss for the Period, Fundamental Errors and Changes in
Accounting Policies, unless the entity is applying the
revised version of that Standard for that earlier period.
Appendix
Amendments to IFRS
1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting
Standards The amendments in this appendix shall be applied
for annual periods beginning on or after 1 September 2004.
If an entity applies this Interpretation for an earlier
period, these amendments shall be applied for that earlier
period.
A1 IFRS 1
First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting
Standards and its accompanying documents are amended as
described below. In paragraph 12 of the IFRS, the reference
to paragraphs 13-25D is changed to 13-25E. Subparagraphs
13(h) and (i) of the IFRS are amended, and subparagraph (j)
is inserted, to read as follows:
(h)
share-based payment transactions (paragraphs 25B and
25C);
(i) insurance
contracts (paragraph 25D);
and
(j)
decommissioning liabilities included in the cost of
property, plant and equipment (paragraph 25E).
In the IFRS, a new
heading and paragraph 25E are inserted, as follows:
Changes in
existing decommissioning, restoration and similar
liabilities included in the cost of property, plant and
equipment
25E IFRIC 1
Changes in Existing Decommissioning, Restoration and Similar
Liabilities requires specified changes in a decommissioning,
restoration or similar liability to be added to or deducted
from the cost of the asset to which it relates; the adjusted
depreciable amount of the asset is then depreciated
prospectively over its remaining useful life. A first-time
adopter need not comply with these requirements for changes
in such liabilities that occurred before the date of
transition to IFRSs. If a first-time adopter uses this
exemption, it shall:
(a) measure
the liability as at the date of transition to IFRSs in
accordance with IAS 37;
(b) to the
extent that the liability is within the scope of IFRIC
1, estimate the amount that would have been included in
the cost of the related asset when the liability first
arose, by discounting the liability to that date using
its best estimate of the historical risk-adjusted
discount rate(s) that would have applied for that
liability over the intervening period;
and
(c) calculate
the accumulated depreciation on that amount, as at the
date of transition to IFRSs, on the basis of the current
estimate of the useful life of the asset, using the
depreciation policy adopted by the entity under IFRSs.
Previous |
Index |
Next
|