|
Commission Regulation
(EC) No 1725/2003 of 29 September
2003 amended by
Regulation (EC) No 2238/2004
and
Regulation (EC) No 1910/2005.
Content |
|
- |
A5. In IAS 37 Provisions,
Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, the footnote
in paragraph 14(a) is deleted.
A6. IAS 38 Intangible
Assets is amended as described below:
Introduction
Paragraph 7 is
deleted.
Standard
In paragraph 7 the
following definition is added:
Entity-specific
value is the present value of the cash flows an entity
expects to arise from the continuing use of an asset and
from its disposal at the end of its useful life or
expects to incur when settling a liability.
In paragraph 7 the
following definitions are amended:
Depreciable
amount is the cost of an asset, or other amount substituted
for cost, less its residual value.
Cost is the
amount of cash or cash equivalents paid and the fair
value of the other consideration given to acquire an asset
at the time of its acquisition or production.
The residual
value of an intangible asset is the estimated amount
that an entity would currently obtain from disposal of
the asset, after deducting the estimated costs of
disposal, if the asset were already of the age
and in the condition expected at the end of its
useful life.
Useful life
is:
(a) the period over
which an asset is expected to be available for
use by an entity; or
(b) the number of
production or similar units expected to be
obtained from the asset by an entity.
Paragraph 18 and the
immediately preceding heading are amended to read as follows:
Recognition and
Measurement
18. The recognition
of an item as an intangible asset requires an entity to
demonstrate that the item meets:
(a) the definition
of an intangible asset (see paragraphs 7-17); and
(b) the recognition
criteria set out in this Standard (see paragraphs 19-55).
This is the case for
costs incurred initially to acquire or internally generate an
intangible asset and those incurred subsequently to add to,
replace part of, or service it.
Paragraph 18A is
added:
18A. The nature of
intangible assets is such that, in many cases, there are no
additions to an asset or replacements of part of an asset.
Accordingly, most subsequent expenditures are likely to
maintain the future economic benefits embodied in an existing
intangible asset rather than meet the definition of an
intangible asset and the recognition criteria set out in this
Standard. In addition, it is often difficult to attribute
subsequent expenditure directly to a particular intangible
asset rather than to the business as a whole. Therefore, only
rarely will subsequent expenditure—expenditure incurred
after the initial recognition of a purchased intangible asset
or after completion of an internally generated intangible
asset—be recognised inthe carrying amount of an asset.
Consistently with paragraph 51, subsequent expenditure on
brands, mastheads, publishing titles, customer lists and items
similar in substance (whether externally purchased or
internally generated) is always recognised in profit or loss
as incurred to avoid the recognition of internally generated
goodwill.
Paragraph 24 is
amended to read as follows:
24. The cost of an
intangible asset comprises:
(a) its purchase
price, including import duties and non-refundable purchase
taxes, after deducting trade discounts and rebates; and
(b) any directly
attributable cost of preparing the asset for its intended use.
Paragraphs 24A-24D
are added:
24A. Examples of
directly attributable costs are:
(a) costs of
employee benefits (as defined in IAS 19 Employee Benefits)
arising directly from bringing the asset to its working
condition; and
(b) professional
fees.
24B. Examples of
costs that are not a cost of an intangible asset are:
(a) costs of
introducing a new product or service (including costs of
advertising and promotional activities);
(b) costs of
conducting business in a new location or with a new class of
customer (including costs of staff training); and
(c) administration
and other general overhead costs.
24C. Recognition of
costs in the carrying amount of an intangible asset ceases
when it is in the condition necessary for it to be capable of
operating in the manner intended by management. Therefore,
costs incurred in using or redeploying an intangibleasset are
not included in the carrying amount of that asset. For example,
the following costs are not included in the carrying amount of
an intangible asset:
(a) costs incurred
while an asset capable of operating in the manner intended by
management has yet to be brought into use; and
(b) initial
operating losses, such as those incurred while demand for the
asset’s output builds up.
24D. Some operations
occur in connection with the development of an intangible
asset, but are not necessary to bring the asset to the
condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the
manner intended by management. These incidental operations may
occur before or during the development activities. Because
incidental operations are not necessary to bring an asset to
the condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in
the manner intended by management, the income and related
expenses of incidental operations are recognised in profit or
loss and included in their respective classifications of
income and expense.
Paragraph 34 is
amended to read as follows:
34. One or more
intangible assets may be acquired in exchange for a
non-monetary asset or assets, or a combination of monetary and
non-monetary assets. The following discussion refers simply to
an exchange of one non-monetary asset for another, but it also
applies to all exchanges described in the preceding sentence.
The cost of such an intangible asset is measured at fair value
unless (a) the exchange transaction lacks commercial substance
or (b) the fair value of neither the asset received nor the
asset given up is reliably measurable. The acquired asset is
measured in this way even if an entity cannot immediately
derecognise the asset given up. If the acquired asset is not
measured at fair value, its cost is measured at the carrying
amount of the asset given up.
Previous |
Index |
Next
|