Content |
|
- |
Recognition of current and deferred tax
57. Accounting for the current
and deferred tax effects of a transaction or other event is
consistent with the accounting for the transaction or event
itself. Paragraphs 58 to 68C implement this principle.
Income statement
58. Current and deferred tax
should be recognised as income or an expense and included in
the net profit or loss for the period, except to the extent
that the tax arises from:
(a) a transaction or event
which is recognised, in the same or a different period,
directly in equity (see paragraphs 61 to 65); or
(b) a business combination (see
paragraphs 66 to 68).
59. Most deferred tax liabilities
and deferred tax assets arise where income or expense is
included in accounting profit in one period, but is included
in taxable profit (tax loss) in a different period. The
resulting deferred tax is recognised in the income statement.
Examples are when:
(a) interest, royalty or
dividend revenue is received in arrears and is included in
accounting profit on a time apportionment basis in
accordance with IAS 18, revenue, but is included in taxable
profit (tax loss) on a cash basis; and
(b) costs of intangible assets
have been capitalised in accordance with IAS 38, intangible
assets, and are being amortised in the income statement, but
were deducted for tax purposes when they were incurred.
60. The carrying amount of
deferred tax assets and liabilities may change even though
there is no change in the amount of the related temporary
differences. This can result, for example, from:
(a) a change in tax rates or
tax laws;
(b) a reassessment of the
recoverability of deferred tax assets; or
(c) a change in the expected
manner of recovery of an asset.
The resulting deferred tax is
recognised in the income statement, except to the extent that
it relates to items previously charged or credited to equity (see
paragraph 63).
Items credited or charged
directly to equity
61. Current tax and deferred
tax should be charged or credited directly to equity if the
tax relates to items that are credited or charged, in the same
or a different period, directly to equity.
62. International
Financial Reporting Standards require or permit certain items
to be credited or charged directly to equity.
Examples of such
items are:
(a) a change in carrying amount
arising from the revaluation of property, plant and
equipment (see IAS 16, property, plant and equipment);
(b) an adjustment to
the opening balance of retained earnings resulting from either
a change in accounting policy that is applied retrospectively
or the correction of an error (see IAS 8 Accounting
Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors).
(c) exchange
differences arising on the translation of the financial
statements of a foreign operation (see IAS 21 The Effects
of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates); and
(d) amounts arising on initial
recognition of the equity component of a compound financial
instrument (see paragraph 23).
63. In exceptional circumstances
it may be difficult to determine the amount of current and
deferred tax that relates to items credited or charged to
equity. This may be the case, for example, when:
(a) there are graduated rates
of income tax and it is impossible to determine the rate at
which a specific component of taxable profit (tax loss) has
been taxed;
(b) a change in the tax rate or
other tax rules affects a deferred tax asset or liability
relating (in whole or in part) to an item that was
previously charged or credited to equity; or
(c) an enterprise determines
that a deferred tax asset should be recognised, or should no
longer be recognised in full, and the deferred tax asset
relates (in whole or in part) to an item that was previously
charged or credited to equity.
In such cases, the current and
deferred tax related to items that are credited or charged to
equity is based on a reasonable pro rata allocation of the
current and deferred tax of the entity in the tax jurisdiction
concerned, or other method that achieves a more appropriate
allocation in the circumstances.
64. IAS 16, property, plant and
equipment, does not specify whether an enterprise should
transfer each year from revaluation surplus to retained
earnings an amount equal to the difference between the
depreciation or amortisation on a revalued asset and the
depreciation or amortisation based on the cost of that asset.
If an enterprise makes such a transfer, the amount transferred
is net of any related deferred tax. Similar considerations
apply to transfers made on disposal of an item of property,
plant or equipment.
65. When an asset is revalued for
tax purposes and that revaluation is related to an accounting
revaluation of an earlier period, or to one that is expected
to be carried out in a future period, the tax effects of both
the asset revaluation and the adjustment of the tax base are
credited or charged to equity in the periods in which they
occur. However, if the revaluation for tax purposes is not
related to an accounting revaluation of an earlier period, or
to one that is expected to be carried out in a future period,
the tax effects of the adjustment of the tax base are
recognised in the income statement.
65A. When an enterprise pays
dividends to its shareholders, it may be required to pay a
portion of the dividends to taxation authorities on behalf of
shareholders. In many jurisdictions, this amount is referred
to as a withholding tax. Such an amount paid or payable to
taxation authorities is charged to equity as a part of the
dividends.
Deferred tax arising from a
business combination
66. As explained in paragraphs 19 and
26(c), temporary differences may arise in a business
combination. In accordance with IFRS 3 Business
Combinations, an entity recognises any resulting deferred
tax assets (to the extent that they meet the recognition
criteria in paragraph 24) or deferred tax liabilities as
identifiable assets and liabilities at the acquisition date.
Consequently, those deferred tax assets and liabilities
affect goodwill or the amount of any excess of the
acquirer’s interest in the net fair value of the acquiree’s
identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities
over the cost of the combination. However, in accordance
with paragraph 15(a), an entity does not recognise deferred
tax liabilities arising from the initial recognition of
goodwill.
67. As a result of a business
combination, an acquirer may consider it probable that it
will recover its own deferred tax asset that was not
recognised before the business combination. For example, the
acquirer may be able to utilise the benefit of its unused
tax losses against the future taxable profit of the
acquiree. In such cases, the acquirer recognises a deferred
tax asset, but does not include it as part of the accounting
for the business combination, and therefore does not take it
into account in determining the goodwill or the amount of
any excess of the acquirer’s interest in the net fair value
of the acquiree’s identifiable assets, liabilities and
contingent liabilities over the cost of the combination.
68. If the potential benefit of the
acquiree’s income tax loss carryforwards or other deferred
tax assets did not satisfy the criteria in IFRS 3 for
separate recognition when a business combination is
initially accounted for but is subsequently realised, the
acquirer shall recognise the resulting deferred tax income
in profit or loss. In addition, the acquirer shall:
(a) reduce the carrying amount of
goodwill to the amount that would have been recognised if
the deferred tax asset had been recognised as an
identifiable asset from the acquisition date;
and
(b) recognise the reduction in the
carrying amount of goodwill as an expense.
However, this procedure shall not
result in the creation of an excess of the acquirer’s
interest in the net fair value of the acquiree’s
identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities
over the cost of the combination, nor shall it increase the
amount previously recognised for any such excess.
|
Example
An entity acquired a
subsidiary that had deductible temporary differences
of 300. The tax rate at the time of the acquisition
was 30 per cent. The resulting deferred tax asset of
90 was not recognised as an identifiable asset in
determining the goodwill of 500 that resulted from
the business combination. Two years after the
combination, the entity assessed that future taxable
profit should be sufficient to recover the benefit
of all the deductible temporary differences.
The entity recognises a
deferred tax asset of 90 and, in profit or loss,
deferred tax income of 90. The entity also reduces
the carrying amount of goodwill by 90 and recognises
an expense for this amount in profit or loss.
Consequently, the cost of the goodwill is reduced to
410, being the amount that would have been
recognised had the deferred tax asset of 90 been
recognised as an identifiable asset at the
acquisition date.
If the tax rate had increased
to 40 per cent, the entity would have recognised a
deferred tax asset of 120 (300 at 40 per cent) and,
in profit or loss, deferred tax income of 120. If
the tax rate had decreased to 20 per cent, the
entity would have recognised a deferred tax asset of
60 (300 at 20 per cent) and deferred tax income of
60. In both cases, the entity would also reduce the
carrying amount of goodwill by 90 and recognise an
expense for that amount in profit or loss.
|
Previous |
Index |
Next
|