Content |
|
- |
Definitions
5. The following
terms are used in this Standard with the meanings specified:
Accounting
policies are the specific principles, bases, conventions,
rules and practices applied by an entity in preparing
and presenting financial statements.
A change in
accounting estimate is an adjustment of the carrying
amount of an asset or a liability, or the amount of the
periodic consumption of an asset, that results
from the assessment of the present status of,
and expected future benefits and obligations associated
with, assets and liabilities. Changes in accounting estimates
result from new information or new developments and, accordingly,
are not corrections of errors.
International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) are Standards
and Interpretations adopted by the International
Accounting Standards Board (IASB). They comprise:
(a) International
Financial Reporting Standards;
(b) International
Accounting Standards; and
(c) Interpretations
originated by the International Financial Reporting
Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) or the former Standing
Interpretations Committee (SIC).
Material Omissions
or misstatements of items are material if they could,
individually or collectively, influence the economic decisions
of users taken on the basis of the financial statements.
Materiality depends on the size and nature of
the omission or misstatement judged in the
surrounding circumstances. The size or nature of the item,
or a combination of both, could be the determining factor.
Prior period
errors are omissions from, and misstatements in, the
entity’s financial statements for one or more prior
periods arising from a failure to use, or misuse
of, reliable information that:
(a) was available
when financial statements for those periods were
authorised for issue; and
(b) could reasonably
be expected to have been obtained and taken into
account in the preparation and presentation of those
financial statements.
Such errors include
the effects of mathematical mistakes, mistakes in
applying accounting policies, oversights or misinterpretations
of facts, and fraud.
Retrospective
application is applying a new accounting policy to
transactions, other events and conditions as if that
policy had always been applied.
Retrospective
restatement is correcting the recognition, measurement
and disclosure of amounts of elements of financial statements
as if a prior period error had never occurred.
Impracticable
Applying a requirement is impracticable when the entity
cannot apply it after making every reasonable effort to do so.
For a particular prior period, it is impracticable to
apply a change in an accounting policy
retrospectively or to make a retrospective restatement
to correct an error if:
(a) the effects of
the retrospective application or retrospective restatement
are not determinable;
(b) the
retrospective application or retrospective restatement
requires assumptions about what management’s intent
would have been in that period; or
(c) the
retrospective application or retrospective restatement
requires significant estimates of amounts and it is
impossible to distinguish objectively
information about those estimates that:
(i) provides
evidence of circumstances that existed on the date(s)
as at which those amounts are to be recognised,
measured or disclosed; and
(ii) would have been
available when the financial statements for that prior period were authorised for
issue from other
information.
Prospective
application of a change in accounting policy and of
recognising the effect of a change in an accounting
estimate, respectively, are:
(a) applying the new
accounting policy to transactions, other events
and conditions occurring after the date as at which the
policy is changed; and
(b) recognising the
effect of the change in the accounting estimate
in the current and future periods affected by the
change.
6. Assessing whether
an omission or misstatement could influence economic decisions
of users, and so be material, requires consideration of the
characteristics of those users. The Framework for
the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements states
in paragraph 25 that “users are assumed to have a reasonable
knowledge of business and economic activities and accounting
and a willingness to study the information with reasonable
diligence.” Therefore, the assessment needs to take into
account how users with such attributes could reasonably be
expected to be influenced in making economic decisions.
Previous |
Index |
Next
|